Associates in Family Medicine: Michelle Hamidi, M.d., 5222 Balboa Ave #31, San Diego, Ca 92117

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when significant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous ballgame charge per unit, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new written report entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just every bit disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors manifestly sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth near vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention past a Life Site News article, we checked with our ain science contacts to review the data and double cheque all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Yeah, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or 2d trimesters.
2. Yep, the report authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring fault that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this report was well-nigh certainly a cover-up to try to merits vaccinating significant women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually show quite the oppose.

Hither'due south how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the 3rd trimester

Tabular array four from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This ways 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their offset or second trimesters. (You take to read the fine print below the table to come across this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or 2d trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies hit the 20-week marking. These are indicated equally "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In elementary math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first xx weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their get-go or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have perchance occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the report authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should accept used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their starting time or second trimesters.

Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the commencement time during her tertiary trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the outset xx weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't exist included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this study should receive an accolade in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they plainly tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to brand it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than iv out of 5 unborn babies in the first twenty weeks of gestation, at least in this information set. (It's a minor prepare of 127 pregnant women, so we'd like to run across a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to go a more than clear moving-picture show.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study request the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number l. They mistakenly split 50 into 100 because at that place are 100 total piece of fruit, so they declare, "l% of lemons are yellow" considering it'southward 50/100.

But the other l pieces of fruit can't possibly exist included because they're limes, not lemons. And so the right math is l/l, which means 100% of the lemons are yellowish. That'south the correct respond.

In this scientific discipline paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were just vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" tin occur. And since meaning women aren't fourth dimension travelers, they tin't go back in time and report a spontaneous ballgame from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either can't exercise this bones math — or are willfully deceiving the earth with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "scientific discipline" has already failed its core promise: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to empathise the world around us.

Yet when 4 out of five pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is just 12.6%. Why? Because they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.

In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is besides named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same error in other studies that ended vaccines posed no significant run a risk of adverse events? For instance, here's another written report he co-authored: "Adverse events subsequently Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That report ended, "Review of VAERS reports did non identify any new or unexpected safety concerns subsequently TIV-ID."

But is that conclusion based on bad math, similar the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? Nosotros call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study architect has made the same systematic fault (or perchance a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the outset time one writer was found to take made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Albeit to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We tin't just take bad math and call it "scientific discipline" when the bad math doesn't cheque out.

Spike poly peptide injections into meaning women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the hateful time, information technology'southward clear that four out of 5 pregnancies are beingness terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at to the lowest degree, according to the small data ready we accept so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) testify that covid vaccine spike proteins directly set on reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with man cells, it should be no surprise whatever that they are achieving a loftier rate of spontaneous abortions in significant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine good and editor of two medical journals. Although he does non characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking significant women and causing more than than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." Yous can hear him in his own words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet past 3.2 million over the next twelvemonth, in the The states solitary, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this example, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and science accept turned confronting humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, centre attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land direction arbiter one time characterized human children as an "environmental adventure."

This is a war. A bioweapons set on. And it goes across mere "crimes confronting humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race past the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to exist motivated by a desire to aid humanity, just are at present clearly shown to exist working towards humanity'due south devastation.

Learn more in today's listen-opening State of affairs Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

quinnhinumet.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post